The feasibility and safety of training patients in opioid treatment to serve as peer recovery support service interventionists.

Background: The use of peer interventionists may be helpful in addressing problems associated with substance use disorders. However, implementation issues such as training, supervision, and the impact of delivering the intervention on the interventionists themselves require additional examination. This report describes the training methods and peer interventionist outcomes in a pilot study of a single-session Peer Recovery Support Services (PRSS) telephone intervention to facilitate enrollment in medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a pilot study testing a PRSS intervention in adults using illicit opioids who reported a recent non-fatal opioid overdose (N = 80, with 40 PRSS participants). Candidates recruited from MOUD treatment programs were trained to deliver the PRSS intervention. Assessments of adverse events, global health, and peer satisfaction were used to evaluate the effects of serving as an interventionist. Fidelity and proportion of cases enrolling in MOUD were calculated for each interventionist. Results: Four consented candidates were trained to deliver the PRSS intervention to thirty-six study participants (90% PRSS arm). All interventionists successfully maintained fidelity to the PRSS intervention and reported no negative effects. Interventionists experienced differential success in encouraging treatment enrollment ranging from 16%-60% of their cases. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates promise in utilizing peer interventionists to deliver a brief PRSS intervention with limited training and no reported negative effects on the interventionists themselves. Factors contributing to the differential success of the interventionists are unclear. Future research on the variable efficacy of peer interventionists is warranted to identify, quantify, and evaluate specific interactional elements associated with peer efficacy. Additionally, further evaluation of training, supervision practices, and the effects of serving as a PRSS interventionist, is needed. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT02922959.

Design considerations for a remote randomized multi-site clinical trial evaluating an e-health self-management program for chronic pain patients receiving opioid therapy.

Based on the adverse consequences and inadequate evidence of effectiveness for long-term opioid therapy (LOT), the CDC developed recommendations to decrease the use of LOT and morphine equivalent dose (MED) for patients receiving LOT. However, the majority of these patients report that opioid medication is significantly beneficial for pain management and are hesitant to reduce/decrease its use. Compounding the problem is poor access to non-pharmacologic therapies for many patients due to insurance reimbursement structures and limited pain-service availability. EMPOWER is an intent-to-treat, two-arm, open-label, randomized controlled trial evaluating a web-based self-management chronic pain program (E-Health) that has been found to reduce self-reported MED, while also decreasing pain, in two randomized controlled trials. Approximately 400 chronic pain patients receiving LOT at a daily average prescribed MED ≥ 20 mg at one of two U.S. healthcare systems, located in North Carolina and Ohio, will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU plus E-Health (E-Health+). TAU consists of LOT from a prescribing clinician. E-Health+ participants are provided with a 4-month E-Health subscription (active treatment phase). All participants will complete web-based self-report measures at baseline, the end of the active treatment phase, and 6-months post-active treatment. Opioid prescription information will be collected from the participants' electronic health record (EHR) from baseline through 6 months post-active treatment. This paper describes design considerations for this unique trial which is conducted completely remotely, with no in-person visits, and utilizes the EHR for participant identification and primary outcome collection.

A brief telephone-delivered peer intervention to encourage enrollment in medication for opioid use disorder in individuals surviving an opioid overdose: Results from a randomized pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) can decrease the risk of opioid overdose (OOD) in individuals with opioid use disorder. Peer recovery support services (PRSS) are increasingly used to promote MOUD engagement but evidence of their efficacy is limited. This study's objective was to evaluate a single 20-minute telephone-delivered PRSS intervention for increasing MOUD enrollment and decreasing recurring OODs. METHOD: This single-site, randomized controlled pilot trial enrolled adults, primarily recruited from a syringe service program, with an opioid-positive urine drug screen (UDS) reporting having been treated for an OOD within the past 6 months. Participants (N = 80) were randomized to PRSS (n = 40) or Control (n = 40) condition with all participants receiving personally-tailored OOD education and naloxone. Outcome measures obtained at 3 (n = 66), 6 (n = 58), and 12 (n = 44) months post-randomization included verified MOUD enrollment (primary), self-reported OOD, and opioid use assessed by self-report and UDS. RESULTS: Through 12-month follow-up, 32.5 % of PRSS, compared to 17.5 % of Control participants enrolled in MOUD (X2 = 2.4, p = 0.12; odds ratio = 2.27 (0.79-6.49)). PRSS participants were significantly less likely to have experienced an OOD through 12-month follow-up (12.5 % of PRSS participants, 32.5 % of Control, p = 0.03). No significant treatment effect was found for opioid use through 12-month follow-up as measured by either opioid-positive UDSs or self-reported past month opioid use days. Based on self-report, PRSS had good acceptability for both the interventionists and participants. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that further development and testing of this PRSS telephone intervention to encourage MOUD enrollment and reduce OOD may be warranted.

Evaluation of a personally-tailored opioid overdose prevention education and naloxone distribution intervention to promote harm reduction and treatment readiness in individuals actively using illicit opioids.

BACKGROUND: Opioid overdose prevention education and naloxone distribution (OEND) programs include information on general risk factors, overdose recognition, and naloxone utilization. This study evaluated a personally-tailored OEND (PTOEND) intervention designed to promote harm reduction and treatment readiness for illicit opioid users by also including education about personal overdose-risk factors and medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). METHOD: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial testing a Peer recovery support service (PRSS) intervention, relative to Control, in adult illicit opioid users reporting treatment for an overdose in the prior 6 months. PTOEND, a 30-minute computer-guided intervention, was administered by a research assistant at the randomization visit to all participants (N = 80). Participants completed a telephone visit 3 weeks post-randomization (n = 74) to assess changes in opioid overdose/MOUD knowledge and treatment readiness. Participants completed in-person visits at 3 (n = 66), 6 (n = 58), and 12 (n = 44) months post-randomization to assess illicit opioid use and naloxone utilization (all time points) and overdose-risk behaviors (12 months). We conducted pre-post analyses of the impact of PTOEND controlling for the PRSS effect. RESULTS: PTOEND increased knowledge of overdose (79.8% to 81.5%, p < 0.05) and MOUD (66.9% to 75.0%, p < 0.01) and decreased perceived treatment barriers (2.1 to 1.9, p < 0.01); desire to quit all substances increased (7.2 to 7.8, p = 0.05). Self-reported opioid use was significantly decreased at each follow-up (all p < 0.01). Self-reported overdose-risk behaviors decreased significantly (6.2 to 2.4, p < 0.01). A majority of participants (65 %) reported naloxone utilization. CONCLUSIONS: PTOEND may be effective for promoting harm reduction and treatment readiness.

Increased Morbidity and Mortality in Hypertensive Patients With Substance Use Disorders: Electronic Health Record Findings.

OBJECTIVE: Substance use disorder (SUD) management by medical providers may be important for patients with comorbid health conditions exacerbated by SUD. This study evaluated potential associations of SUD with morbidity and mortality in a large sample of hypertensive patients. METHOD: Analysis of a limited data set was obtained through IBM Watson Health Explorys, a platform integrating data from electronic health records. Matched controls were defined for each of five SUDs: tobacco use disorder (TUD), alcohol use disorder (AUD), cocaine use disorder (COUD), opioid use disorder (OUD), and cannabis use disorder (CUD) using Mahalanobis distance within propensity score calipers. All patients were from The MetroHealth System (Cleveland, OH) and had diagnosed hypertension. SUD group participants had diagnosed abuse/dependence for the substance of interest. Controls for each SUD group had no diagnosis code related to the substance of interest and were selected to match the SUD patients on several factors. Total sample sizes for each SUD-control comparison ranged from 3,176 (CUD) to 49,696 (TUD); proportions of female patients ranged from 31.7% (AUD) to 51.2% (TUD). Outcomes were diagnosis (yes/no) of the following: cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, renal failure, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Logistic regressions revealed that SUD was significantly associated with cerebrovascular accident (odds ratios [ORs]: TUD = 2.23; AUD = 1.68; COUD = 2.53; OUD = 1.87; CUD = 2.20), renal failure (ORs: TUD = 1.46; COUD = 2.09; OUD = 1.77), myocardial infarction (ORs: TUD = 2.96; AUD = 1.92; COUD = 3.00), and mortality (ORs: TUD = 1.34; AUD = 1.60; COUD = 1.83; OUD = 1.35; CUD = 1.39). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with hypertension, those with SUDs appear to have significantly greater risk for morbidity and mortality, suggesting the importance of managing SUD in hypertensive patients.

The association between regular cocaine use, with and without tobacco co-use, and adverse cardiovascular and respiratory outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the potential impact of cocaine use on health is increasingly important as cocaine use rises in the U.S. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the associations of regular cocaine use, with and without tobacco co-use, with cardiovascular and respiratory outcomes. METHODS: Analysis of a limited dataset obtained through IBM Watson Health Explorys, a platform integrating electronic health record data. Matched controls were defined for: 1) cocaine-using patients (n = 8244; 44 % female); and subgroups of cocaine-using patients: 2) with an encounter diagnosis for tobacco use disorder (TUD; n = 4706); and 3) without a TUD diagnosis (non-TUD; n = 3538). Patients had at least one documented medical evaluation in the MetroHealth System (Cleveland, Ohio). Cocaine-using patients had an encounter diagnosis of cocaine abuse/dependence and/or ≥2 cocaine-positive drug screens. Control patients, with no documented cocaine-use, were matched to the cocaine-using patients on demographics, residential zip code median income, body mass index, and, for the total sample, TUD-status. Outcomes were encounter diagnosis (yes/no) of cerebrovascular accident, heart arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, subarachnoid hemorrhage, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: TUD-patients had the greatest prevalence of cardiovascular and respiratory disease, regardless of cocaine-use indication. In the total sample, TUD, and non-TUD subgroups, regular cocaine use was significantly associated with greater risk for cerebrovascular accident, arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, asthma, COPD, pneumonia and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Cocaine use is associated with significantly greater risk of adverse cardiovascular and respiratory diagnoses and all-cause mortality.

Medication treatment for opioid use disorder in expectant mothers (MOMs): Design considerations for a pragmatic randomized trial comparing extended-release and daily buprenorphine formulations.

Opioid use disorder (OUD) in pregnant women has increased significantly in recent years. Maintaining these women on sublingual (SL) buprenorphine (BUP) is an evidence-based practice but BUP-SL is associated with several disadvantages that an extended-release (XR) BUP formulation could eliminate. The National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) is conducting an intent-to-treat, two-arm, open-label, pragmatic randomized controlled trial, Medication treatment for Opioid-dependent expectant Mothers (MOMs), to compare mother and infant outcomes of pregnant women with OUD treated with BUP-XR, relative to BUP-SL. A second aim is to determine the relative economic value of utilizing BUP-XR. Approximately 300 pregnant women with an estimated gestational age (EGA) of 6-30 weeks, recruited from 12 sites, will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to BUP-XR or BUP-SL, balancing on site, EGA, and BUP-SL status (taking/not taking) at the time of randomization. Participants will be provided with study medication and attend weekly medication visits through 12 months postpartum. Participants will be invited to participate in two sub-studies to evaluate the: 1) mechanisms by which BUP-XR may improve mother and infant outcomes; and 2) effects of prenatal exposure to BUP-XR versus BUP-SL on infant neurodevelopment. This paper describes the key design decisions for the main trial made during protocol development. This Investigational New Drug (IND) trial uniquely uses pragmatic features where feasible in order to maximize external validity, hence increasing the potential to inform clinical practice guidelines and address multiple knowledge gaps for treatment of this patient population.

The association between regular cannabis use, with and without tobacco co-use, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes: cannabis may have a greater impact in non-tobacco smokers.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the potential impact of cannabis use on cardiovascular health is increasingly important as cannabis use rises in the U.S. Objectives: This study evaluated the associations between regular cannabis use, with and without tobacco co-use, and cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS: Analysis of a limited dataset obtained through IBM Watson Health Explorys, a platform integrating electronic health record data. Matched controls using Mahalanobis distance within propensity score calipers were defined for: 1) cannabis-using patients (n = 8,944; 43% female); and subgroups of cannabis-using patients: 2) with an encounter diagnosis for tobacco use disorder (TUD; n = 4,682); and 3) without a TUD diagnosis (non-TUD; n = 4,262). Patients had ≥1 blood pressure measurement and blood chemistry lab result in the MetroHealth System (Cleveland, Ohio). Cannabis-using patients had an encounter diagnosis of cannabis abuse/dependence and/or ≥2 cannabis-positive urine drug screens. Control patients, with no cannabis-use-documentation, were matched to the cannabis-using patients on demographics, residential zip code median income, body mass index, and, for the total sample, TUD-status. Outcomes were encounter diagnosis (yes/no) of cerebrovascular accident (CVA), heart arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: TUD-patients had the greatest prevalence of cardiovascular disease, regardless of cannabis-use indication. In the total sample and non-TUD subgroup, regular cannabis use was significantly associated with greater risk for CVA, arrhythmia, SAH, and mortality. In the TUD subgroup, regular cannabis use was significantly associated with greater risk for arrhythmia and SAH. CONCLUSIONS: Cannabis use is associated with significantly greater risk of adverse cardiovascular diagnoses and overall death, particularly in non-tobacco users.

Regular cannabis use, with and without tobacco co-use, is associated with respiratory disease.

BACKGROUND: Cannabis use is a potential risk factor for respiratory disease but its role apart from tobacco use is unclear. We evaluated the association between regular cannabis use, with and without tobacco co-use, and onset of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and pneumonia. METHODS: Analysis of a limited data set obtained through IBM Watson Health Explorys, an electronic-health-record-integration platform. Matched controls using Mahalanobis distance within propensity score calipers were defined for: 1) cannabis-using patients (n = 8932); and subgroups of cannabis-using patients: 2) with an encounter diagnosis for tobacco use disorder (TUD; n = 4678); and 3) without a TUD diagnosis (non-TUD; n = 4254). Patients had at least: one recorded blood pressure measurement and one blood chemistry lab result in the MetroHealth System (Cleveland, Ohio). Cannabis-using patients had an encounter diagnosis of cannabis abuse/dependence and/or ≥2 cannabis-positive urine drug screens (UDSs). Control patients, not having cannabis-related diagnoses or cannabis-positive UDSs, were matched to the cannabis-using patients on demographics, residential zip code median income, body mass index, and, for the total sample, TUD-status. RESULTS: Regular cannabis use was significantly associated with greater risk for asthma (odds ratio (OR) = 1.44; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.50; OR = 1.32), COPD (OR = 1.56; aOR = 1.44; OR = 2.17), and pneumonia (OR = 1.80; OR = 1.84; OR = 2.13) in the total sample and TUD and non-TUD subgroups, respectively. TUD-patients had the greatest prevalence of respiratory disease, regardless of cannabis-use indication. CONCLUSIONS: Regular cannabis use is associated with significantly greater risk of respiratory disease regardless of TUD status. Future research to understand the impact of cannabis use on respiratory health is warranted.

Medical complications associated with substance use disorders in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension: electronic health record findings.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Screening for substance use disorder (SUD) in general medical settings may be particularly important in patients with comorbid health conditions exacerbated by SUD. This study evaluated whether SUD is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) complications in patients with co-occurring T2DM and hypertension. DESIGN: Analysis of a limited data set obtained through IBM Watson Health Explorys, a platform integrating data from electronic health records. Matched controls were defined for each of five SUDs: tobacco use disorder (TUD), opioid use disorder (OUD), cocaine use disorder, cannabis use disorder (CUD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) using Mahalanobis distance within propensity score calipers. SETTING: All patients were seen in the MetroHealth System (Cleveland, OH, USA) and had diagnosis codes for T2DM and hypertension. PARTICIPANTS: SUD group participants had a diagnosis of abuse/dependence for the substance of interest. Controls for each SUD group had no diagnosis code related to the SUD of interest and were selected to match the SUD patients on demographics, residential zip code median income and body mass index. Total sample sizes for each SUD-control comparison ranged from 1160 for CUD to 22 128 for TUD. MEASUREMENTS: Outcome was diagnosis (yes/no) of four T2DM complications (cerebrovascular accident, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic renal disease, myocardial infarction) and all-cause mortality. FINDINGS: Logistic regressions revealed that SUD was significantly associated with greater risk of cerebrovascular accident [TUD odds ratio (OR) = 1.79, OUD-OR = 1.94, cocaine use disorder OR = 2.67], diabetic neuropathy [TUD-adjusted OR (aOR) = 1.47, cocaine use disorder-aOR = 1.35, AUD-aOR = 1.27], diabetic renal disease (TUD-aOR = 1.25, OUD-OR = 1.34), myocardial infarction (TUD-OR = 1.96, OUD-OR = 2.01, cocaine use disorder-OR = 2.68, CUD-OR = 2.48, AUD-OR = 1.42) and mortality (TUD-OR = 1.15, cocaine use disorder-OR = 1.61, CUD-OR = 1.49, AUD-OR = 1.35). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients in Ohio USA with both type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension, those with substance use disorders appear to have greater risk for T2DM complications and all-cause mortality.

Substance use outcomes in cocaine-dependent tobacco smokers: A mediation analysis exploring the role of sleep disturbance, craving, anxiety, and depression.

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance may play a role in cocaine use outcomes and, hence, may be a potential therapeutic target for cocaine use disorder (CUD). Research in this area, which has largely relied on resource-intensive polysomnography, would be facilitated by identifying a self-report sleep measure predictive of CUD outcomes and by a better understanding of the mechanisms by which sleep may impact CUD outcomes. This study tested the predictive validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a self-report assessment of past-month sleep quality. To better understand potential mechanisms, mediation models relating sleep disturbance to CUD outcomes were evaluated. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from cocaine-dependent (n = 290) participants in a multi-site trial evaluating smoking-cessation treatment for stimulant-dependent patients. The PSQI was collected at baseline; the outcomes of interest were cocaine and drug abstinence at end-of-treatment (weeks 9-10). Potential mediators, measured in weeks 1-8, were: cocaine craving (Brief Substance Craving Scale); and anxiety and depression symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Mediation techniques were used to evaluate mediation effects separately and jointly. RESULTS: The majority of participants (58.3%) had baseline sleep disturbance. Sleep disturbance was not a significant predictor of end-of-treatment abstinence when regressed without consideration of mediators. Cocaine craving, anxiety, and depression were significant mediators, both separately and jointly, of an effect of baseline sleep disturbance on end-of-treatment abstinence. CONCLUSION: This exploratory analysis suggests that there may be an indirect relationship between self-reported sleep quality and substance use outcomes in cocaine-dependent patients, mediated by craving, anxiety, and depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01077024.

Multisite, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of buspirone as a relapse-prevention treatment for cocaine dependence.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential efficacy of buspirone as a relapse-prevention treatment for cocaine dependence. METHOD: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 16-week pilot trial was conducted at 6 clinical sites between August 2012 and June 2013. Adult crack cocaine users meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for current cocaine dependence who were scheduled to be in inpatient/residential substance use disorder (SUD) treatment for 12-19 days when randomized and planning to enroll in local outpatient treatment through the end of the active treatment phase were randomized to buspirone titrated to 60 mg/d (n = 35) or placebo (n = 27). All participants received psychosocial treatment as usually provided by the SUD treatment programs in which they were enrolled. Outcome measures included maximum days of continuous cocaine abstinence (primary), proportion of cocaine use days, and days to first cocaine use during the outpatient treatment phase (study weeks 4-15) as assessed by self-report and urine drug screens. RESULTS: There were no significant treatment effects on maximum continuous days of cocaine abstinence or days to first cocaine use. In the female participants (n = 23), there was a significant treatment-by-time interaction effect (χ²1 = 15.26, P < .0001), reflecting an increase in cocaine use by those receiving buspirone, relative to placebo, early in the outpatient treatment phase. A similar effect was not detected in the male participants (n = 39; χ²1 = 0.14, P = .70). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that buspirone is unlikely to have a beneficial effect on preventing relapse to cocaine use and that buspirone for cocaine-dependent women may worsen their cocaine use outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01641159.

A randomized trial of concurrent smoking-cessation and substance use disorder treatment in stimulant-dependent smokers.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of concurrent treatments for substance use disorder and nicotine-dependence for stimulant-dependent patients. METHOD: A randomized, 10-week trial with follow-up at 3 and 6 months after smoking quit date conducted at 12 substance use disorder treatment programs between February 2010 and July 2012. Adults meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for cocaine and/or methamphetamine dependence and interested in quitting smoking were randomized to treatment as usual (n = 271) or treatment as usual with smoking-cessation treatment (n = 267). All participants received treatment as usual for substance use disorder treatment. Participants assigned to treatment as usual with concurrent smoking-cessation treatment received weekly individual smoking cessation counseling and extended-release bupropion (300 mg/d) during weeks 1-10. During post-quit treatment (weeks 4-10), participants assigned to treatment as usual with smoking-cessation treatment received a nicotine inhaler and contingency management for smoking abstinence. Weekly proportion of stimulant-abstinent participants during the treatment phase, as assessed by urine drug screens and self-report, was the primary outcome. Secondary measures included other substance/nicotine use outcomes and treatment attendance. RESULTS: There were no significant treatment effects on stimulant-use outcomes, as measured by the primary outcome and stimulant-free days, on drug-abstinence, or on attendance. Participants assigned to treatment as usual with smoking-cessation treatment, relative to those assigned to treatment as usual, had significantly better outcomes for drug-free days at 6-month follow-up (χ(2)(1) = 4.09, P <.05), with a decrease in drug-free days from baseline of -1.3% in treatment as usual with smoking-cessation treatment and of -7.6% in treatment as usual. Participants receiving treatment as usual with smoking-cessation treatment, relative to those receiving treatment as usual, had significantly better outcomes on smoking point-prevalence abstinence (25.5% vs 2.2%; χ(2)(1) = 44.69, P < .001; OR =18.2). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that providing smoking-cessation treatment to illicit stimulant-dependent patients in outpatient substance use disorder treatment will not worsen, and may enhance, abstinence from nonnicotine substance use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01077024.

Achieving smoking abstinence is associated with decreased cocaine use in cocaine-dependent patients receiving smoking-cessation treatment.

BACKGROUND: Past research suggests that a significant relationship exists between cigarette smoking and illicit-stimulant abuse. The present study evaluated the association between achieving smoking abstinence in response to smoking-cessation treatment (SCT) and illicit-stimulant abstinence in cocaine- and/or methamphetamine-dependent participants. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a randomized, 10-week trial conducted at 12 substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programs. Two hundred and sixty seven adults, meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for cocaine and/or methamphetamine-dependence and interested in quitting smoking were randomized to SUD treatment as usual plus SCT consisting of weekly individual smoking cessation counseling, extended-release (XL) bupropion (300 mg/day), nicotine inhaler, and contingency management for smoking abstinence. Illicit-stimulant-abstinence was measured by self-report and urine drug screens. Smoking abstinence was assessed via self-report and carbon monoxide levels. RESULTS: A significant effect was found for the cocaine-dependent subsample (N=147) in which participants who stopped smoking were abstinent for illicit stimulants an average of 78.2% of the post-smoking-quit weeks (weeks 4-10) relative to 63.6% in participants who continued smoking (X(2)(1)=8.55, p<.01, d=0.36). No significant effects were found for the sample as a whole (N=249) or for the methamphetamine-dependent subsample (N=102). CONCLUSIONS: The present results suggest that cocaine-dependent patients achieving smoking abstinence in response to SCT might evidence not only improved smoking outcomes but improved cocaine-use outcomes as well. Future research to replicate this finding appears warranted.

An Evaluation of Substance Abuse Treatment and HIV Education on Safe Sex Practices in Cocaine Dependent Individuals.

Background. There is a strong association between crack/cocaine use and increased sexual risk behavior, but little research on the efficacy of HIV education for decreasing such behavior in crack/cocaine-addicted individuals in substance abuse treatment. Method. Datasets from two cocaine dependence trials including either one or three HIV education sessions, respectively, were analyzed for changes over time in the proportion of participants practicing safe sex. A pooled dataset from two earlier trials not offering HIV education was also analyzed. Results. We included 83 participants from the 1-session trial and 65 participants from the 3-session trial. Both sets of participants evidenced a significant increase in the proportion of participants having safe sex with casual partners. Participants in the 3-session HIV education study also evidenced a significant increase in the proportion of participants having safe sex with regular partners. In the trials without HIV education, no change in safe sex practices was found, and change in condom use was observed only among female participants. Conclusions. These findings are consistent with recommendations that HIV education/counseling should be provided to individuals in substance abuse treatment. A randomized controlled trial to confirm these results may be warranted. This trial is registered with NCT00033033, NCT00086255, NCT00015106, and NCT00015132.

A tale of two stimulants: mentholated cigarettes may play a role in cocaine, but not methamphetamine, dependence.

BACKGROUND: Research suggests that mentholated cigarettes may play a role in cocaine dependence. The purpose of the present study was to expand upon the research on mentholated cigarettes and cocaine dependence and to evaluate the role of mentholated cigarettes in methamphetamine dependence. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a multisite, randomized trial evaluating the impact of smoking-cessation treatment in stimulant-dependent outpatients (N=538). Participants' reasons for concurrent use of cigarettes and illicit stimulants were assessed via self-report. Stimulant-abstinence was measured by self-report and urine drug screens. Smoking cessation was assessed via self-report and carbon monoxide levels. RESULTS: Of the 301 cocaine-dependent participants, 201 (67%) were menthol and 100 (33%) were non-menthol cigarette smokers. Cocaine-dependent participants who smoked menthol, compared to non-menthol, cigarettes were significantly more likely to report that cigarettes prolong their cocaine high (X(2)(1)=16.3, p<.0001, OR=3.58 [95% CI: 1.88-6.79]) and were less likely to be stimulant abstinent during active treatment (W=3.6, p<0.001, d=.39 [95% CI: 0.16-0.62]), at 3-month follow-up (X(2)(1)=14.4, p<0.001, OR=.32 [95% CI: 0.17-0.58]), and at 6-month follow-up (X(2)(1)=4.6, p=0.03, OR=.53 [95% CI: 0.29-0.95]). No parallel differences were found between menthol and non-menthol methamphetamine-dependent smokers. The prevalence of Caucasian menthol smokers was significantly greater in the cocaine-dependent participants (37.2%) than in the methamphetamine-dependent participants (17.61%), (X(2)(1)=14.4, p<.001, OR=2.77 [95% CI:1.62-4.73]). Smoking cessation was not significantly associated with cigarette type for either cocaine- or methamphetamine-dependent participants. CONCLUSIONS: The present results suggest that mentholated cigarettes play a role in cocaine, but not methamphetamine, dependence.

Preliminary evaluation of a model of stimulant use, oxidative damage and executive dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Illicit stimulant use increases oxidative stress and oxidative stress has been found to be associated with deficits in memory, attention and problem-solving. OBJECTIVE: To test a model of the association among oxidative DNA damage, a severe form of oxidative stress, and stimulant use, executive function and stimulant-use outcomes. METHODS: Six sites evaluating 12-step facilitation for stimulant abusers obtained peripheral blood samples from methamphetamine-dependent (n = 45) and cocaine-dependent (n = 120) participants. The blood samples were submitted to a comet assay to assess oxidative DNA damage. Executive Dysfunction was assessed with the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe), which is a reliable and valid self-report assessment of executive dysfunction, disinhibition and apathy. Stimulant-use measures included self-reported stimulant use and stimulant urine drug screens (UDS). RESULTS: While more recent cocaine use (<30 days abstinence) was associated with greater oxidative DNA damage (W = 2.4, p < 0.05, d = 0.36), the results did not support the hypothesized relationship between oxidative DNA damage, executive dysfunction and stimulant use outcomes for cocaine-dependent patients. Support for the model was found for methamphetamine-dependent patients, with oxidative DNA damage significantly greater in methamphetamine-dependent patients with executive dysfunction (W = 2.2, p < 0.05, d = 0.64) and with executive dysfunction being a significant mediator of oxidative DNA damage and stimulant use during active treatment (ab = 0.089, p < 0.05). As predicted, neither disinhibition nor apathy were significant mediators of oxidative damage and future stimulant use. CONCLUSION: These findings provide preliminary support for a model in which oxidative damage resulting from methamphetamine use results in executive dysfunction, which in turn increases vulnerability to future stimulant use.